Yoga Vashishtha 2.18.61–70
(Nature of the world is a dream, to be understood with analogies)
श्रीवसिष्ठ उवाच ।
स्वप्नाभत्वं च जगतः श्रुते शास्त्रेऽवबोध्यते ।
शीघ्रं न पार्यते वक्तुं वाक्किल क्रमवर्तिनी ॥ ६१ ॥
स्वप्नसंकल्पनाध्याननगराद्युपमं जगत्।
यतस्त एव दृष्टान्तास्तस्मात्सन्तीह नेतरे ॥ ६२ ॥
अकारणे कारणता यद्बोधायोपमीयते।
न तत्र सर्वसाधर्म्यं संभवत्युपमाश्रमैः ॥ ६३ ॥
उपमेयस्योपमानादेकांशेन सधर्मता ।
अङ्गीकार्यावबोधाय धीमता निर्विवादिना ॥ ६४ ॥
अर्थावलोकने दीपादाभामात्रादृते किल ।
न स्थानतैलवर्त्यादि किंचिदव्युपयुज्यते ॥ ६५ ॥
एकदेशसमर्थत्वादुपमेयावबोधनम् ।
उपमानं करोत्यङ्ग दीपोऽर्थप्रभया यथा ॥ ६६ ॥
दृष्टान्तस्यांशमात्रेण बोध्यबोधोदये सति ।
उपादेयतया ग्राह्यो महावाक्यार्थनिश्चयः ॥ ६७ ॥
न कुतार्किकतामेत्य नाशनीया प्रबुद्धता।
अनुभूत्यपलापान्तैरपवित्रैर्विकल्पितैः ॥ ६८ ॥
विचारणादनुभवकारिवैरिणोऽपि वाङ्मयं त्वनुगतमस्मदादिषु ।
स्त्रियोक्तमप्यपपरमार्थवैदिकं वचो वचःप्रलपनमेव नागमः ॥ ६९ ॥
अस्माकमस्ति मतिरङ्ग तयेति सर्वशास्त्रैकवाक्यकरणं फलितं यतो यः।
प्रातीतिकार्थमपशास्त्रनिजाङ्गपुष्टात्संवेदनादितरदस्ति ततः प्रमाणम् ॥ ७० ॥
Maharishi Vashishta said:
2.18.61: The world is understood to be like a dream through the teachings of the scriptures, but this cannot be quickly explained, as speech follows a gradual process.
2.18.62: The world is likened to a dream, a thought, a meditative vision, or a city in the sky; these examples are used because they reflect its nature, not otherwise.
2.18.63: When causality is attributed to something without a cause for the sake of understanding, complete similarity between the example and the subject is not possible due to the limitations of analogies.
2.18.64: A Wise and discerning person should accept partial similarity between the subject and the analogy for the sake of understanding, without dispute.
2.18.65: Just as a lamp is used to see an object by its light alone, without needing its stand, oil, or wick, so too is the analogy used for understanding.
2.18.66: An analogy, by supporting one aspect, facilitates understanding of the subject, just as a lamp illuminates an object with its light.
2.18.67: When understanding arises through a partial aspect of the example, the essence of the great scriptural teachings should be accepted as valid.
2.18.68: One should not fall into false reasoning or destroy awakened understanding with impure, baseless doubts or denials of experience.
2.18.69: Through reflection, even the words of enemies or ordinary people, if aligned with Ultimate Truth and Vedic Wisdom, should be considered valid, not mere chatter.
2.18.70: Our conviction, supported by all scriptures, yields the fruit of understanding; beyond personal experience and scriptural authority, no other proof is needed.
Summary of Teachings:
The verses from Yoga Vasishta 2.18.61 to 2.18.70, as spoken by Sage Vasishta, focus on the nature of the world as an illusory phenomenon, akin to a dream, and the use of analogies to facilitate spiritual understanding. The teachings emphasize that the world’s apparent Reality is comparable to transient mental constructs like dreams or imagined cities. This perspective is rooted in scriptural wisdom, but the gradual nature of human speech limits how quickly this profound truth can be conveyed. The verses underscore the importance of grasping the essence of the world’s illusory nature to progress toward spiritual awakening.
A key theme is the role of analogies in conveying complex metaphysical truths. The scriptures use examples like dreams or meditative visions to illustrate the world’s lack of inherent Reality. However, Vasishta cautions that analogies are inherently limited; they cannot fully capture the subject due to the absence of complete similarity. A Wise seeker should focus on the partial similarity that aids comprehension, accepting it as a tool for insight rather than demanding perfect equivalence. This approach encourages intellectual humility and openness to partial truths that lead to deeper understanding.
The verses further liken analogies to a lamp that illuminates an object through its light alone, without reliance on its physical components.
Similarly, an analogy’s purpose is to shed light on a specific aspect of truth, enabling the seeker to grasp the essence of the teaching. The emphasis is on practical understanding rather than overanalyzing the analogy’s limitations. This method aligns with the broader Advaita Vedanta framework, where intellectual clarity supports experiential Realization of non-dual Reality.
Vasishta also advises against succumbing to false reasoning or skeptical doubts that undermine awakened understanding. The seeker is encouraged to remain steadfast in their Realization, avoiding distractions from baseless arguments or impure thoughts. Even words from unlikely sources, such as ordinary people or adversaries, should be valued if they align with Ultimate Truth and Vedic Wisdom. This reflects the text’s pragmatic approach to wisdom, prioritizing truth over the source of the teaching.
Finally, the teachings culminate in the assertion that personal experience, supported by scriptural authority, is the ultimate proof of Truth. The convergence of direct Realization and the consistent message of the scriptures provides the seeker with unshakable conviction. By emphasizing reflection, experience, and alignment with authoritative texts, these verses guide the aspirant toward a clear understanding of the world’s illusory nature and the path to Realization through Discernment and Wisdom.