Yoga Vashishtha 3.95.15–27
(Sriram's reasoning on connection between action and the doer of action)
श्रीराम उवाच।
अविसंवादिनार्थे यद्यत्प्रामाणिकदृष्टिभिः।
वीतरागैर्विनिर्णीतं तच्छास्त्रमिति कथ्यते ॥ ३५॥
महासत्त्वगुणोपेता ये धीराः समदृष्टयः।
अनिर्देश्यकलोपेताः साधवस्त उदाहृताः ॥ १६॥
द्वयं हि दृष्टिर्बालानां सिद्धये सर्वकर्मणाम्।
साधुवृत्तं तथा शास्त्रं सर्वदैवानुवर्तते ॥ १७॥
साधुसंव्यवहारार्थं शास्त्रं यो नानुवर्तते।
बहिःकुर्वन्ति तं सर्वे स च दुःखे निमज्जति ॥ १८॥
इह लोके च वेदे च श्रुतिरित्थं सदा प्रभो।
यथा कर्म च कर्ता च पर्यायेणेह संगतौ ॥ १९॥
कर्मणा क्रियते कर्ता कर्त्रा कर्म प्रणीयते।
बीजाङ्कुरादिवन्न्यायो लोकवेदोक्त एव सः ॥ २०॥
कर्मणो जायते जन्तुर्बीजादिव नवाङ्कुरः।
जन्तोः प्रजायते कर्म पुनर्बीजमिवाङ्कुरात् ॥ २१॥
यया वासनया जन्तुर्नीयते भवपञ्जरे।
तद्वासनानुरूपेण फलं समनुभूयते ॥ २२॥
एवं स्थिते कथं नाम जन्मबीजेन कर्मणा।
विनोत्पत्तिस्त्वया प्रोक्ता भूतानां ब्रह्मणः पदात् ॥ २३॥
पक्षेणानेन भगवन्भवता जन्मकर्मणोः।
तिरस्कृता जगज्जाता साऽविनाभावितैतयोः ॥ २४॥
ब्रह्मण्यकारणे ब्रह्मन्ब्रह्मादिषु फलेषु च।
कर्मणां फलमस्तीति द्वयं लोके प्रमार्जितम् ॥ २५॥
संजाते संकरे लोके कर्मस्वफलदायिषु।
मात्स्यन्याये विलसति नाश एवावशिष्यते ॥ २६॥
किं तत्कृतं भवत्येव भगवन्ब्रूहि तत्त्वतः।
एनं मे संशयं स्फारं छिन्धि वेद्यविदांवर ॥ २७॥
Sriram said:
3.95.15–21
> That which is firmly decided, regarding an uncontradicted truth, by those free from attachment who possess authoritative insight, is called scripture.
> Those who are endowed with the great quality of purity (sattva), who are firm-minded, who have equal vision toward all, and who possess indescribable noble qualities, are called the virtuous (sādhus).
> For the success of all actions of those who are still immature, there are always two guiding principles: the conduct of the virtuous and the scriptures. One should always follow them.
> Anyone who does not follow the scriptures for the sake of proper conduct with the virtuous is rejected by everyone, and he himself sinks into misery.
> O Lord, in this World and in the Veda, the sacred tradition always declares that action and the doer are connected here, following one another in succession.
> The doer is produced by action, and action is carried out by the doer. This principle, like the relationship between a seed and a sprout, is stated both in worldly usage and in the Veda.
> A living Being is born from action, just as a new sprout arises from a seed. In turn, action arises from the living Being, just as a seed comes from a sprout.
3.95.22–27
> By the particular latent impression (vāsanā) through which a living Being is led into the cage of Worldly existence, a result corresponding exactly to that impression is experienced.
> This being the case, how then have you declared that the origin of Beings from the State of Brahm takes place without the action that is the seed of birth?
> O revered one, by this view of yours the universally accepted mutual dependence of birth and action has been set aside.
> O wise one, the dualistic notion that actions yield results—both in the Causeless Brahm and in effects such as Brahmā and others—is completely wiped out in the World.
> When confusion arises in the World regarding actions that no longer yield results, and the law of the fish (stronger devouring the weaker) prevails, only destruction remains.
> What then is actually accomplished, O Lord? Tell me the truth. Cut asunder this vast doubt of mine, O best among those who know what is to be Known.
Summary of the teachings:
These verses present Sri Rama’s careful reasoning about the nature of true scripture, the character of the virtuous, and the inseparable link between action (karma) and the doer. He first defines scripture as that which is established by dispassionate, authoritative seers on the basis of uncontradicted truth. He then describes the virtuous as those filled with pure sattva, equal vision, and noble qualities. For ordinary people still growing in understanding, the two reliable guides for successful action are the conduct of such virtuous persons and the scriptures themselves. Anyone who discards these guides is socially rejected and falls into suffering.
Rama next recalls the clear teaching of both worldly experience and the Veda: action and the doer continuously produce each other, exactly as a seed produces a sprout and the sprout produces a new seed. A living Being arises from previous action; that being then generates fresh action. The latent impressions (vāsanās) that drive a being through the cycle of existence also determine the precise fruits that being experiences. This mutual dependence of birth and action is presented as an established fact.
Against this background Rama raises a pointed doubt about the teaching he has heard earlier—that Beings arise from the Pure State of Brahm without the involvement of action as the seed of birth. He argues that such a view appears to set aside the universally acknowledged inseparable connection between birth and action. If actions are said to have no results either in the Causeless Brahm or in the World of effects beginning with Brahmā, then the entire dualistic framework of action and its fruit is erased.
Rama warns of the practical consequences of such confusion. When people come to believe that actions yield no results, moral order collapses; the law of the jungle (the stronger devouring the weaker) takes over, and only destruction remains. Finally he earnestly requests Vasistha to resolve this large and urgent doubt by explaining what is truly accomplished in the light of the higher teaching, so that the apparent contradiction may be removed.